Skip to main content
Centre de ressources Turn Your Fleet’s Safety Data into a Competitive Advantage

Turn Your Fleet’s Safety Data into a Competitive Advantage

septembre 29, 2026 Andrew Santosusso

The Supreme Court’s Montgomery decision gives brokers more reason to scrutinize carrier safety practices. Here’s how fleets can turn documented safety performance into a competitive advantage.

What happens when a broker asks you to prove that you’re a safe carrier? You can easily say yes, but the harder part is proving it. Can you pull up the safety events? Show the video clips, the driver’s response, the coaching that followed, and the corresponding hours-of-service record? Because brokers now have more reason to ask those questions.

On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC that federal law does not block state negligent-hiring lawsuits against freight brokers. That means a broker may have to defend how it chose a carrier after a crash. The ruling doesn’t make brokers automatically liable when a carrier they hired has a problem, but it means those negligent-hiring claims can proceed in state court.

This puts more pressure on brokers to examine carrier safety practices, and on carriers to demonstrate those practices. And that’s where safety data becomes more than a compliance record.

Why This Matters to Carriers

Most of the coverage has focused on brokers facing higher insurance costs and more litigation exposure. But carriers are affected too, because the added due diligence lands on them.

A broker defending a negligent-hiring claim will need to show what it knew about the carrier and what it did to vet it. Registration and insurance are just the starting point. Safety ratings, Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) scores and inspection history are already part of most vetting processes; after Montgomery, expect brokers to go further and ask about the practices behind those numbers:

  • How does the carrier monitor drivers?
  • What steps are taken when a driver has a safety event?
  • Can you produce records of that when asked?

That makes the ability to produce those records quickly more important. If a broker asks how you’ve handled a safety issue, you should be able to produce a paper trail showing what happened and how you responded.

Semi-truck hauling fuel down a higway through wheat fields.

The Problem Isn’t Usually the Data

Most fleets already collect this information. The difficulty is that a safety event rarely lives in one place. The video may be in the camera system, the driver’s response in a coaching workflow, and the corresponding hours-of-service information in the electronic logging device (ELD). Each system holds its own part of the record.

If someone asks for the complete record six months later, the challenge isn’t necessarily having the information. It’s pulling all of it together into something a broker or an attorney can follow. That takes time, and it depends on people remembering where everything is.

A record that holds up under questioning follows the event from start to finish. It should show:

  • What happened. The event itself, with video and vehicle data, including time, location, speed, and what the system detected.
  • How the driver was involved. Whether the driver was alerted at the time, and how they responded when they reviewed the event afterward.
  • What the fleet did about it. Coaching, training, or other corrective action, with dates.
  • What came next. Whether the behavior repeated or stopped.

Each of those pieces exists in most fleets. What varies is whether they’re connected to each other.

Putting the Pieces Together

FleetCam, DriveShield, and IntelliHub each cover part of that chain, and they’re built to work as one system.

When a safety event happens, FleetCam provides the first piece of the record: what actually happened. Video captures the event, and in-cab alerts notify the driver when the system detects unsafe driving behaviors such as distraction, fatigue, harsh braking, or phone use. Each event is stored with its timestamp, location, and the data that triggered it.

From there, DriveShield documents the response. The driver can review the event, acknowledge or dispute it, and provide an explanation. Plus, the exchange between driver and their coach is saved with the event. When a driver’s events reach a pre-set threshold, training can be assigned, and the completed course becomes part of the record. The scorecard trends, past activity tracking, and emerging patterns then give the fleet ways to see whether the driver’s behavior improves over time.

IntelliHub adds the operational information around the event. ELD records show the driver’s duty status at the time, with each entry marked as automatically recorded or manually entered. Location history and vehicle data fill in where the truck was and what it was doing. When a broker or auditor needs the hours-of-service record, it can be exported and sent directly to the FMCSA.

Put those pieces together and your team has something more useful than a collection of individual system records: a searchable history of what happened and how your organization responded.

IntelliHub ELD dashboard

Turn Documentation into Something You Can Show

When a broker asks about your safety practices, “we take safety seriously” is the answer everyone gives. A carrier that can pull up a specific event, the driver’s response, the training that followed, and the ELD record for that day is giving a different kind of answer. It shows there’s a process, and that the process is actually being followed.

That’s useful in a compliance review, but it can also matter in a sales conversation. When two carriers offer similar rates and service, being able to demonstrate a documented safety process gives a broker another reason to choose you.


Ready to turn your safety data into proof you can put in front of customers and brokers? See how our end-to-end fleet management platform captures safety events, documents corrective action, and gives your team a searchable record of fleet performance.

FAQ

What did the Supreme Court decide in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II?

The Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act’s safety exception allows state negligent-hiring claims against freight brokers to proceed when they concern motor vehicles used in transportation. The Court reversed the Seventh Circuit and sent the case back for further proceedings.

Does the Montgomery decision make brokers liable for their carriers’ actions?

No. The decision means certain negligent-hiring claims against brokers are not automatically blocked by federal preemption. It does not establish automatic liability whenever a carrier causes a crash or commits a safety violation.

What does Montgomery mean for motor carriers?

The decision may give brokers more reason to examine a carrier’s safety practices when selecting transportation providers. For carriers, that makes it increasingly useful to maintain accessible records showing how safety events are identified, addressed, and followed up.

What safety records should a carrier be able to produce?

A useful safety record can connect the event itself with the driver’s response and the fleet’s follow-up. Depending on the systems a fleet uses, that may include video, vehicle and location data, driver coaching records, training, and the applicable hours-of-service records.

How can fleet management technology help document safety practices?

Fleet management systems can bring safety events, video, driver coaching, training, vehicle data, and ELD records together so fleet teams can find and review the history of an event without reconstructing it from separate systems.

Prêt à rendre la gestion du parc automobile plus facile à gérer ?